Legal AI
Legal that keeps the pace of the business. Contracts analysed, compliance held, watch kept current. The AI clears the ground, the lawyer decides. Always under control.
The risk that slips under the radar
-
The contract skimmed
A supplier contract arrives, it needs signing this week. Nobody has time to read it line by line, so it gets skimmed and signed. Risky clauses slip under the radar until the day they turn against you.
-
Compliance endured
GDPR, AI Act, sector obligations: texts change, deadlines arrive, and compliance stays a project that keeps getting pushed back. On the day of the audit or the incident, the gaps surface. Compliance is always done under pressure.
-
The watch never done
Tracking regulatory changes takes time nobody has. New rules are discovered by chance, in the press or from a peer, often too late. The company reacts to rules instead of anticipating them.
What the AI
clears
Incoming contracts dissected
+ documents
Outgoing contracts from templates
+ Workspace
GDPR / AI Act mapping
+ sources
Official sources tracked
+ Search APIs
Skimmed, or fully informed
Sign fast, discover late
- The contract is skimmed under deadline pressure
- Risky clauses only surface at the dispute
- Compliance is discovered on audit day
- Regulatory watch arrives too late, by chance
You decide on a clear note
- Every contract arrives summarised: risks, gaps, negotiation points
- Dangerous clauses are flagged before signing
- Compliance is a maintained dashboard, not an endured project
- The watch surfaces the changes that concern you, ahead of time
Not a promise of legal without lawyers. An average measured on the legal teams we have relieved of raw reading, the lawyer always the decision-maker.
- −72% incoming contract reading time
- ×5 standard contract drafting speed
- 4,0× ROI measured at 12 months
The AI clears,
the lawyer decides.
No clause is accepted, no contract is sent, no obligation is marked compliant without a lawyer validating it. The AI does the clearing work that eats the days: reading, comparing, summarising, alerting. The decision that binds the company stays, always, in human and accountable hands.
- Risk clauses flagged before any signature
- Lawyer validation checkpoint on every output
- Watch plugged into official sources, not rumour
Tech SME.
Reading time cut by three quarters.
We still sign ourselves. But we sign knowing what we sign.
Legal leadership, tech SME
Tools
deployed
| Category | Tool | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning model | Claude Opus 4.8 | Fine clause analysis, risk detection, nuanced contract drafting. |
| Context model | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Comparison to templates, compliance mapping, legal summaries. |
| Volume model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Document sorting, metadata extraction, file classification. |
| Connected documents | DocuSign · Google Workspace | Connection to your signature tools and legal document base. |
| Watch | Search APIs · Sources officielles | Watch plugged into official regulatory sources, not rumour. |
| Durable workflow | LangGraph | Process orchestration with a lawyer validation checkpoint on every output. |
The lawyer's questions.
Q.01 Can the AI approve a contract in my place?
No, and that is deliberate. The AI reads, compares and summarises to save you clearing time. Approving a clause or signing a contract stays a human, accountable act, never delegated.
Q.02 Are our confidential contracts protected?
Yes. Documents stay in your environment, hosting is in the EU, access is logged. No contract is used to train a model. Sovereignty over your legal data stays total.
Q.03 Does the watch cover our sector?
It is plugged into official regulatory sources and calibrated on your obligations: GDPR, AI Act and the sector texts that concern you. Changes surface as a summary, before they become an emergency.
A risk to map?
45 minutes to review your current contracts and obligations and price what assisted clearing would change.
Talk to an expert →Contracts mastered.
Compliance held.
45 minutes. We look at your current contracts and obligations, price what assisted clearing would change. If we have nothing to offer, we say so.